MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061553443 · doi:10.1159/000112346

Molecular Genetic Approaches to the Study of the Nervous System pp. 189–201

2007· review· en· W2061553443 on OpenAlexaff
Michael R. Hayden, J.L. Nichols

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neuroscience · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNervous systemMendelian inheritanceHereditary DiseasesBiologyDiseaseAlleleGeneticsGenetic linkageNeuroscienceNeurologyGeneDuchenne muscular dystrophyMuscular dystrophyBioinformaticsMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disorders primarily affecting the nervous system comprise approximately one third of all established Mendelian genetic diseases in man. Recombinant DNA technology provides new approaches to the diagnosis and elucidation of the molecular pathology of these disorders. For a small but increasing number of disorders the DNA sequence coding for the involved protein has been used to define the precise molecular defect. An example is the Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. In many other situations, DNA fragments located near to the mutant gene can be used in family linkage studies to determine who is likely to have inherited the abnormal allele(s). Examples include Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Huntington's disease, and phenylketonuria. This technology offers unique opportunities to investigate the function of the nervous system in health and disease and will have a major impact on the neurosciences and the practice of clinical neurology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.243
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.072 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental NeuroscienceSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207