Germline alterations in the <i>CDH1</i> gene in familial gastric cancer in the Japanese population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Germline point or small frameshift mutations of the CDH1 (E-cadherin) gene are known to cause familial gastric cancer (FGC), but the frequency of CDH1 mutations is low in Japanese patients with FGC. Because recent studies have reported germline large genomic deletions of CDH1 in European and Canadian patients with FGC, in the present study we examined DNA samples from 13 Japanese patients with FGC to determine whether similar germline changes were present in CDH1 in this population. Using a sequencing analysis, a 1-bp deletion (c.1212delC), leading to the production of a truncated protein (p.Asn405IlefsX12), was found in an FGC family; immunohistochemical analysis revealed the loss of CDH1 protein expression in the tumors in this family. Using a combination of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and RT-PCR analyses, we also found a large genomic deletion (c.164-?_387+?del), leading to the loss of exon 3 and the production of a truncated protein (p.Val55GlyfsX38), in another FGC family. The functional effects of the detected mutations were examined using a slow aggregation assay. Significant impairment of cell-cell adhesion was detected in CHO-K1 cells expressing Ile405fsX12- and Gly55fsX38-type CDH1 compared with cells expressing wild-type CDH1. Our results suggest that the p.Asn405IlefsX12 and p.Val55GlyfsX38 mutations of the CDH1 gene contribute to carcinogenesis in patients with FGC. This is the first report of CDH1 germline truncating mutations in Japanese patients with FGC. Screening for large germline rearrangements should be included in CDH1 genetic testing for FGC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".