MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Melt migration beneath mid-ocean ridges

2000· article· en· W2061597524 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdolreza Ghods, J. Arkani-Hamed

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLithosphereGeologyAsthenosphereRidgeCrustMid-ocean ridgeRidge pushMid-Atlantic RidgePartial meltingPetrologyMelt flow indexGeophysicsMantle (geology)SeismologyTectonicsMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a two-phase flow model, we investigate the formation of a high-percentage melt layer beneath the oceanic lithosphere and focusing of the melt towards the ridge axis, taking into account freezing and melt extraction. Melt migration is modelled dynamically within a viscous permeable media that includes the asthenosphere and viscous part of the lithosphere. Due to a much faster melt migration in the brittle part of the lithosphere, the melt migration is simulated by instantaneous melt extraction from an assigned melt extraction region beneath the ridge axis. It is shown that a high-percentage melt layer forms and successfully focuses melt to a narrow zone beneath the mid-ocean ridge. Performance of the melt focusing mechanism is not significantly sensitive to the size of the melt extraction region, the melt extraction threshold and the spreading rate. In all of our models, about half of the total melt production freezes beneath the base of the lithosphere and the rest is focused towards the ridge and forms the crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207