MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061628238 · doi:10.1109/icca.2009.5410381

Identification of a linear model for nonlinear systems

2009· article· en· W2061628238 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiong Tang, R. Doraiswami, Chris Diduch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)HarmonicsLinear systemCascadeNonlinear system identificationNonlinear controlSystem identificationOperating pointComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)MathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsControl (management)EngineeringVoltageData modelingElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown that the output of a certain class of nonlinear dynamic systems can match arbitrarily close the output of a linear dynamic system if the spectral content of the probing input is the same as that of the output of the nonlinear system. The class of nonlinear systems with cascade or feedback combination of static nonlinear elements and a linear dynamic system is considered. If the static nonlinearity is odd symmetric, and the input signal is periodic, persistently exciting with only odd harmonics then it is shown that an arbitrarily close match between the output of the linear system and the nonlinear system may be achieved. The proposed method differs from the traditional linear approximation model in that it captures the behavior of the nonlinear system over a larger region of the operating point. The proposed scheme is verified on simulated nonlinear systems, and tested on a physical system, and finds application in system identification for control design, fault diagnosis, and analysis of the behavior of the nonlinear system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207