Study on the Structure and Properties of a Hybrid Resins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polysilicate modified polyurea/vinyl ester hybrid resins were produced by dispersing water glass (WG) in a mixture ofvinyl ester (VE) and polyisocyanate in presence of a liquid phosphate as emulsifier. As styrene-crosslinkable VE resinsbisphenol A (BA) and novolac types (N), whereas as polyisocyanate a polymeric methylene diphenyl isocyanate (PMDI)were used. The structure and selected properties of the hybrid resins were determined and compared to those of the neatVEs and polysilicate filled polyurea (denoted as 3P resin). Using VE for resin hybridization, which worked as anadditional emulsifier for the WG/PMDI/phosphate system, resulted in a fine particle dispersion of the polysilicate. Itwas found that the type of VE affected not only the dispersion of WG (and thus of the polysilicate) but also the networkformation of the polyurea/VE hybrids and their properties. Information about the structure of the polysilicate filledhybrid resins was gained from dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), scanning electron and atomic forcemicroscopic measurements. It was argued that the resin hybridization yielded a conetwork instead of an interpenetratingone. The properties of the hybrid systems were determined by DMTA, fracture mechanical tests, thermogravimetricanalysis and flammability measurements. It was established that the stiffness and resistance to thermal degradation ofthe initial 3P resin was strongly improved by hybridization with VEs. The fracture toughness (Kc) proved to be lesssensitive to the formulation of the hybrid resins. On the other hand, the fracture energy (Gc) and limiting oxygen indexexperienced a positive deviation from the additivity as a function of the 3P/VE composition, at least in a given range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".