MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2061677288 · doi:10.2118/107361-ms

Applications of Electric Logs and Geomechanical Models to Optimize Drilling and Well Completions in the Burgos Basin

2007· article· en· W2061677288 on OpenAlexaff
Norberto Monroy-Ayala, Antonio Hernández-Patiño, Eduardo Celis, Judith Sheridan, Chris Ward, Juan Torne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringDrillingCasingBoreholeHydraulic fracturingGeologyCompletion (oil and gas wells)WellboreMeasurement while drillingGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Electric logs and borehole imaging were used to build a geomechanical model to predict wellbore instability during drilling and to optimize casing designs and completions to control sand production in the Burgos Basin. This paper describes how geomechanical models can explain several problems in drilling and completion during the development of some of the fields in Northern Mexico. The total stress tensor model, the pore pressure model, and the mechanical properties model are discussed. Validation of the model is a critical step before it can be applied to design new wells. The geomechanical model was used to design a new well and to optimize drilling, completion, and production techniques for the reservoir. The model was used to optimize the placement and orientation of perforations, evaluate proposed hydraulic fracturing designs, and select the critical draw-down to produce a well. Actual drilling, completion, and production events for the new well were analyzed, and conclusions about how the geomechanical model supported the complete design are also included in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→