Le dilemme de la justice transitionnelle et la réconciliation dans les sociétés postguerre civile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les violations graves des droits humains sont une des principales causes des conflits armés. Certains conflits sont le théâtre de plusieurs de ces violations – crimes de guerre et contre l’humanité y compris. Punir les auteurs de ces crimes constitue généralement une des mesures essentielles de prévention de ces types de conflits. Cependant, si les rapports de force ne permettent pas de prononcer la victoire décisive de l’une ou plusieurs parties et que l’on doive résoudre le conflit par voie de négociation, il devient souvent impossible d’écarter les seigneurs de guerre, qu’il faudrait traduire en justice, du fait qu’ils sont indissociables du processus de paix. L’objectif principal de cet article est de proposer une réponse au dilemme qui en résulte dans les cas spécifiques de trois pays africains : le Libéria, la Sierra Leone et l’Ouganda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".