MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061712627 · doi:10.4113/jom.2005.33

Map of the glacial geomorphology of north-central Québec-Labrador, Canada

2005· article· en· W2061712627 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Krister N. Jansson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Maps · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRoyal Swedish Academy of Sciences
KeywordsDeglaciationMeltwaterMoraineGlacial periodGlacial landformGlacierGeologyLandformGeomorphologyPhysical geographyIce fieldGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Please click here to download the map associated with this article. The “map of the glacial geomorphology of North-Central Québec-Labrador, Canada”, based on aerial photograph interpretation, presents the distribution of glacial and glaciofluvial landforms, such as glacial lineations, eskers, ribbed moraine, and glacial lake shorelines. It covers an area of approximately 180,000 km2 between 53° and 56° 30′ N and 64° and 74° E and shows that north-central Québec-Labrador exhibits a more complex pattern of landforms than previously recognized. This mapping project was initiated as a test of the hypothesis that north-central Québec-Labrador exhibited cold-based conditions at least during the latest deglaciation as was suggested in previous studies based on glacial geomorphology. Cold-based conditions inhibit basal sliding and formation of subglacial landforms, which requires that marginal meltwater traces are the main source of information when reconstructing the spatial retreat pattern during a cold-based deglaciation. Therefore this new map also includes results of detailed mapping of the regional distribution of meltwater features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.149

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MapsSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207