MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061715438 · doi:10.1080/03602550600609143

High-Temperature Bulk Copolymerization of Methyl Methacrylate and Acrylonitrile: III. Thermal Polymerization

2006· article· en· W2061715438 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Khesareh, Neil T. McManus, Alexander Penlidis

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAcrylonitrileCopolymerReactivity (psychology)Methyl methacrylateMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryPolymerizationAtmospheric temperature rangeGlass transitionMethacrylateThermodynamicsPolymerComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermally initiated copolymerization of methyl methacrylate and acrylonitrile has been studied in the bulk phase. Experiments for estimating reactivity ratios were conducted at 120°C and 140°C. Feed composition constraint approaches were used to design the reactivity ratio experiments. The error in variables model (EVM) method was employed to evaluate the reactivity ratios and analyze the error. The results showed that the reactivity ratios did not vary significantly with temperature up to 140°C for both thermally initiated and experiments with initiator. Full conversion range experiments were also conducted at 140°C. The rate of reaction, copolymer composition, M¯ n , M¯ w , and glass transition temperatures of samples were measured.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer-Plastics Technology and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207