Bibliographic record
Abstract
After completing this article, readers should be able to: Recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) is a frequent and troublesome complaint in childhood and adolescence, and the search for a cause and a credible approach to management can be taxing for both family and physician. The term “recurrent abdominal pain” was coined by the British pediatrician John Apley, who first published on the subject in 1958. His definition included at least three attacks of pain occurring over a period of 3 months that were severe enough to affect activities and for which no organic cause was identified. In practice, the definition may include any child or adolescent who has RAP for which the family seeks medical attention and explanation, even if the duration of the pain does not adhere strictly to the Apley definition. The definition explicitly excludes the many causes of acute abdominal pain, which lie outside the scope of this review.There is wide variation in the threshold of severity and frequency that must be crossed before a family will seek medical attention for a child who has RAP. Inevitably, parents want a clear explanation and reassurance that no sinister causes lurk undetected, and the clinician wants to oblige but often lacks the conviction that organic causes have been excluded. The most difficult challenge for the clinician is to determine to what extent diagnostic studies should be employed before the label “recurrent abdominal pain” is applied. Whereas abdominal pain may be the chief manifestation of a large number of precisely defined illnesses, more than 90% of the time a “disease” will not be defined and the family will be left with a “functional” explanation. In spite of extensive study and a vast literature base, RAP remains an elusive symptom in search of an etiology. How to diagnose and manage this common pediatric problem constitutes the subject of this review.RAP has been reported to occur in 10% to 15% of children between the ages of 4 and 16 years. A community-based study of 500 adolescents (mean age, 15.5 y) revealed that 13% to 17% experienced weekly pain, which in 20% of cases was severe enough to affect activities. There clearly is an overlap between the “normal” population that may experience recurrent pain symptoms but not complain sufficiently to seek medical attention and others who have a seemingly similar degree and frequency of pain and do come for assessment. Many sociocultural, familial, and emotional factors determine a child’s response to pain, and these also will affect the likelihood of seeking medical attention to explain and treat the problem. Although Apley and others have reported RAP to be the most common pain syndrome of childhood, headaches and limb pains appear to have an equal prevalence.In a study of 1,000 school-age children, RAP affected males and females equally up to 9 years of age. After 9 years, the incidence in females increased such that between 9 and 12 years, the female-to-male ratio was 1.5:1. The overall incidence appears to peak at 10 to 12 years. RAP is rare among children younger than 5 years of age, and an organic cause must be considered even more carefully in this younger age group. The vast literature published on this subject reveals no evidence of changes in the incidence or clinical profile of this common pediatric pain syndrome; it seems to be here to stay.The origins of abdominal pain are complex and do not lend themselves to a single model of causation. Numerous organic disorders lead to abdominal pain; in most, the pathophysiology is related to inflammation (eg, Crohn disease) or distension or obstruction of a hollow viscus (eg, obstructive uropathy). Most studies indicate that fewer than 10% of children who present with RAP have an identifiable organic etiology.The exact mechanism of pain remains unclear in the majority of children in whom no organic cause can be identified. The most typical pattern of periumbilical pain so characteristic of RAP appears to be visceral in origin, probably originating in the small intestine or colon. To date, no pattern of consistent motility disturbance has been identified in any subgroup of patients experiencing nonorganic abdominal pain. Emotions, cognitive processes, and other central nervous system influences may modulate the perception of pain to produce an altered awareness of the discomfort from these visceral sensations. This “visceral hyperalgesia” describes a heightened awareness of sensations that might not be perceived or expressed as pain in other children.Models that try to relate psychological influences in a primary causal manner (emotional stress leads to RAP) are too simplistic. However, stress can cause recognized physiologic effects, such as increased cortisol levels, sympathetic tone, and tachycardia, so it is entirely plausible that it could exert physiologic effects on the gut through altered motility or some other as yet unidentified mechanism.Oft-repeated assumptions that children who have RAP are anxious, perfectionist, socially unskilled, and self-conscious have taken on an aura of validity that is unsupported by objective evidence. Several case-control studies have failed to demonstrate significant differences for a range of measures of psychological distress between groups of children who have “functional” RAP and those who have a demonstrable organic cause for their pain. Others contradict these studies, showing that those who have RAP have higher levels of anxiety and depression than do “well” children. Illness or pain clearly causes anxiety and distress, but this must be distinguished from invoking “stress” as a source of primary causation. There are no objective methods of measuring stress, and what seems to be a source of stress for one child (eg, birth of a sibling, upcoming athletic or music competition) may be of no apparent emotional consequence for another child of the same age. As in adults, some children seem to “buckle under stress” and become anxious and emotionally distressed; others facing the same challenge become invigorated and rise to new heights of effort and achievement.For some children, anxiety and emotional stress seem to manifest in a range of pain complaints, of which abdominal pain and headache are the two most common. Parents sometimes can date the onset of the pain to a specific time, such as the beginning of a new school year or a marriage breakup. Family dynamics and individual coping styles influence the way in which children express or even acknowledge their pain. Some families encourage their children to express pain in ways that unwittingly may reinforce the complaint.The tripartite classification proposed by Barr may be the most helpful method of categorizing children who present with RAP. This classification includes: 1) those who have organic disease, 2) those who have a clear psychogenic etiology such as depression or school phobia, and 3) the traditional “functional” group in which neither organic disease nor a clear psychogenic etiology is manifest.The majority of children who have RAP are considered to have a functional etiology. The problem of defining functional RAP is daunting. In its simplest form, the concept encompasses all causes that do not have an identifiable organic etiology. Most typically, the pain occurs in episodes that are periumbilical, self-limited, unrelated to meals or activities, and rarely if ever sufficient to awaken the child from sleep. The growth pattern and findings on the physical examination are normal. The degree of interference with normal activities and school attendance may seem out of proportion to the frequency and severity of the episodes as described. It has been observed wryly that “Organicity of pain is inversely proportional to the number of school absences.”Some children who have RAP manifest many of the characteristics associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), as defined in adults. The criteria for making this diagnosis are: 1) abdominal pain relieved by defecation, 2) more frequent stools at the onset of the pain, 3) altered stool form (hard or loose or watery), 4) passage of mucus, and 5) associated bloating or abdominal distension. To define this syndrome requires a degree of detail regarding bowel function that the clinician will find difficult to elicit from children, who are notoriously reluctant to reveal or discuss their bowel habits. In adults, the division is made between those who have constipation-dominant and diarrhea-dominant symptoms. There is some evidence that altered intestinal motility, mediated by peptides excreted by both gut and brain, plays a role in the etiology of IBS. There are no laboratory markers; the diagnosis rests on the history. Although some clinicians include constipation under the diagnostic category of IBS, most recognize it as a separate diagnosis.Many factors lead to constipation in children, the foremost of which is dietary. Modern diets are replete with highly processed starches, and many children shun fruits, vegetables, and higher-fiber foods. An unwillingness by some children to take the time to evacuate their bowels completely, coupled in some cases with a reluctance to use school washrooms, can seriously compound this problem. Sometimes the role of constipation as a major contributing factor to abdominal pain will be clear, with the parent noting that the child goes days between bowel movements and that the stool is bulky and hard. Often the pediatrician faces the problem of ferreting out this diagnosis in the face of inadequate history; the parent is unaware of the child’s bowel pattern and the child is tight-lipped and unwilling to discuss the matter in any detail. Findings on abdominal and rectal examinations may not confirm this diagnostic suspicion; a plain abdominal radiograph may be needed.There may be a long latency between onset of symptoms and a confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although ulcerative colitis often presents with abdominal pain associated with hematochezia and tenesmus, the early symptoms of Crohn disease may be more insidious and nonspecific. Abdominal pain and diarrhea may be intermittent, and the clinician must be alert to the presence of lethargy, growth and pubertal delay, and extraintestinal manifestations such as oral, joint, and perirectal involvement. With the widespread availability of endoscopy, a diagnosis usually can be made promptly.The frequency with which incomplete absorption of lactose and other carbohydrates produces RAP in children is unclear, as are outcomes in several large and well-conducted studies. Initial enthusiasm for this diagnosis as a significant cause for RAP has waned. A wide range of racial/ethnic groups—Asian, Jewish, Mediterranean, and African-Americans—are predisposed to lactase deficiency, with incidences reported as high as 60% to 80%. Lactose ingestion will cause symptoms of bloating, loose stools, and cramping abdominal pain in those who are affected. It appears to be an uncommon cause of RAP in the absence of other gastrointestinal symptoms. The diagnosis is made most reliably by breath hydrogen testing. If this diagnostic tool is unavailable, it is reasonable to use lactase-treated milk products or a complete restriction of milk products for several weeks as a therapeutic trial. It is important to recognize that lactose intolerance results simply in carbohydrate maldigestion; it is not, per se, a cause of malnutrition or growth failure.The discovery of H pylori has changed the approach to diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Epidemiologic evidence indicates that this infection is more prevalent among those living in low socioeconomic circumstances, so infection rates are significantly higher in less developed nations. Even in developed countries, the prevalence of H pylori infection is approximately 40%. However, the great majority of affected individuals have no signs or symptoms; they have infection but no disease.The intense interest in H pylori has generated numerous tests and treatments that, unfortunately, are being used in excess of their established benefits and often counter to the best interests of the patient.Several lines of evidence indicate that H pylori infection alone rarely is the cause of abdominal pain in children unless peptic ulcer disease is present. A meta-analysis of more than 40 published reports shows strong evidence for an association between H pylori gastritis and duodenal ulcer disease in children, but weak or no evidence for an association between H pylori infection and RAP. Serologic studies have shown that antibodies to H pylori occur with similar prevalence among children who do and do not have RAP. In a large multicenter study from Germany, symptom assessment could not distinguish between children who had H pylori gastritis and those who had “functional” RAP. Symptoms improved or resolved in 87% of children in whom H pylori was eradicated successfully, but also in 93% of those in whom eradication failed and in 80% of those who had “functional” RAP. H pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease should be suspected when abdominal pain is primarily epigastric; when it awakens the child from sleep; and when it is associated with anorexia, nausea, recurrent vomiting, anemia, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Although abdominal pain is common in children, peptic ulcer disease is very uncommon; therefore, testing for H pylori should not be part of the preliminary evaluation of a child who has RAP.Given the important distinction between H pylori infection and disease, engaging in a fishing expedition for evidence of H pylori infection is not an appropriate strategy for investigating RAP. Antibodies in or may for years infection has making their presence in The breath is for the presence of H pylori but many causes of and peptic ulcer disease present with similar symptoms. when the of symptoms the presence of ulcer disease, with is the approach for the diagnosis and tests but their role in children has not yet been pylori causes approximately of primary peptic ulcer disease in children, but is In ulcer disease may be associated with Crohn and other of is a symptom complex of pain, bloating, and discomfort that may occur with or demonstrable is when these symptoms are by and association between and abdominal pain remains and many clinicians the of a of as is a common problem in both pediatric and with a prevalence reported to be as high as some children who have headache to also will experience RAP. usually is recognized when episodes of abdominal pain occur in association with and vomiting, with complete between episodes and sometimes with associated A strong family of to the Most abdominal as an explanation for RAP when the has headaches that are of to RAP is with can cause that usually associated with It is that with can cause diarrhea associated with abdominal and pain, but diarrhea usually is the The role of and in RAP in the absence of diarrhea has been in a small number of studies, but their role remains With the present of a search for an etiology for RAP is not usually in the absence of can present with RAP and must be in inflammatory disease, and are important diagnostic Many of these causes can be by requires in children who have and is to its is to clinicians in the that the most diagnostic they to the problem of RAP in childhood are a and physical The of diagnostic to the foremost that patients and their families be not A diagnosis usually can be suspected a and physical In to their diagnostic a complete and physical examination will to parents that their are taken the and family at and to express their As children in age, they are included in the and part of the of an adolescent should take from the It may be to the with the parents this should be with the parents at the to a by in and that the family The most parents are those who that they have been and the who a high degree of and should the and frequency of the pain, with associated symptoms. It should be that the child’s of the of the pain (eg, is of in making a diagnosis children often are unclear as to the of these The of the pain to school and is important to A of the child’s bowel and and the in which the pain It is to define the degree to which the pain with the child’s activities and school has been is a of such as family school and manifestations of or carefully for the Although abdominal pain may be the for the the may be the child’s or school The role of in both the pain (eg, and in to the pain should be The concept of that organic disease has a long and and the on are in It is important to recognize that may not be at the first may be physical examination should be with attention to extraintestinal The assessment should with of the and to growth is Although the child should be does should be in too on a child’s the clinician should the and with the child and the response to The should be carefully for or signs of Although a rectal examination may be it is highly to many children and should not be it is important to and to pain and should be to the in that 10% to 15% of cases of RAP are to an organic to organic disease should be carefully The out all approach can lead to a of that simply the that some cause has been and must be even when the clinician is of the functional of the pain. In most should be to a complete and examination of a stool for In the presence of significant a stool for and and examination is role of is important but and requires A single of the can be in defining the presence of significant when is high but the is and results of the physical examination are of abdominal as a tool seems very on However, it can be for causes of abdominal pain, when the is (eg, obstructive or (eg, or the gastrointestinal causes such as an also may be revealed by It is an appropriate when the pain is when are on or when the pain to the in a of any is considered as a and levels, and stool for should be this diagnosis is highly for and is gastrointestinal and small bowel remains a in the diagnosis of Crohn disease. is levels have been as a for but their role as a clinical tool remains to be the pattern of pain peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal with is the approach to or peptic disease is diagnostic to a to in diagnosis and management is the complex of abdominal pain in children, the clinician to have sufficient and experience to when to and when to many cases of RAP may reveal a diagnosis on first diagnostic in others may be several and the of The clinician should an approach that of a diagnostic before making management may appropriate the majority of the diagnostic will be one of functional RAP. The first and most is to explain the concept of functional abdominal pain to the Many parents will that pain that has a or the child is The most method of the parents of this is to the abdominal pain with headache in adults. Most have and the cause rarely is associated with any physical findings or the pain is and not this concept has been it is important to parents on to manage the parents to a sympathetic that the pain but activities and school attendance to the degree It is important to out that children are highly and parents should from the child the pain if the child is not The role of increased in the pain is one published study a has its therapeutic It must be that the diets of many children in developed are in and a of by seems a strategy that will do no The to a of to should be role of in the management of the child who has RAP is and many families will their However, some children have pain that has clear of a psychogenic origin, which with school attendance and other activities. children may be to and the of a or in pain management can and or clear diagnosis of constipation requires treatment with stool which may to be by an to that the bowel is It should be made clear that the role of constipation in RAP be with the child is bowel movements for a period of the lactose most clinicians and a of a for several the such a should of lactose by lactase-treated milk and and The problem with this approach is the role of the any that may both the child’s and the perception of the that or rarely cause of suspected requires treatment with appropriate the of abdominal is seriously a of seems study from or also could be families and children in the that is all a conviction that will be by with a gastrointestinal degree to which become has clinical for In study more than one of RAP patients to complain of abdominal pain to than of the were identified as an organic cause for their pain. In a of patients who had RAP from the and the complaint 5 to years their A study by and that more than one of RAP patients had or recurrent abdominal symptoms as adults, and one of well-conducted studies of RAP patients by and patients 5 to years who had RAP reported significantly higher levels of abdominal pain and other as many from or and made significantly more the years than the the best the pediatrician can demonstrate is that the pain will be that for some this will not be the who has with RAP is left with some anxiety that a significant organic diagnosis has been that will appear at some time to an at the clinician who in that the cause was This seems to be a rare and evidence of organic disease in 3 of and other studies have shown similar low abdominal pain in childhood will to to diagnosis or The clinician will a evaluation first and foremost on a and physical as appropriate by
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".