MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061736520 · doi:10.1063/1.2338289

University of Toronto’s balloon-borne Fourier transform spectrometer

2006· article· en· W2061736520 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Debra Wunch, C. Midwinter, J. R. Drummond, C. T. McElroy, Anne-Flore Bagès

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPayload (computing)Tracking (education)ElectronicsHousekeepingSpectrometerSoftwareComputer scienceRemote sensingFourier transformComputer hardwareOpticsPhysicsAerospace engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringGeologyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A commercial ABB-Bomem DA5 Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS) was refitted with new software and electronics to create a FTS that is appropriate for both ground-based and balloon-based measurements. Nearly all the electronics were replaced, and new control software was written that allows the instrument to run remotely, provides access to all housekeeping information, and permits considerable freedom in data processing approaches. A “delta” tracker was used for fine tracking of the sun over a small tracking range, using the main gondola pointing system for coarse azimuth tracking. This facilitated a simple, effective method of instrument integration onto the payload. The new design reduced the mass of the FTS from 90to55kg and reduced the power consumption from 145to65W.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207