MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061767706 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22054

An improved algorithm for calculation of the natural gas compressibility factor via the Hall‐Yarborough equation of state

2014· article· en· W2061767706 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hooman Fatoorehchi, Hossein Abolghasemi, Randolph Rach, Moein Assar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdomian decomposition methodConvergence (economics)CompressibilityAlgorithmState (computer science)Compressibility factorEquation of stateMathematicsPoint (geometry)Applied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationDifferential equationMathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Hall‐Yarborough equation (H‐Y equation) of state has been favoured in natural gas engineering due to its accuracy and conciseness for many years. In this paper, the Adomian decomposition method (ADM) is employed to devise a novel algorithm for calculating the compressibility factors of natural gases through this reliable equation of state. A convergence accelerator technique, namely the efficient Shanks transform, is also exploited to further improve our scheme in terms of computational speed. Unlike most of the previous numerical solution strategies, our algorithm does not require an initial guess as the starting point and is computationally efficient. The proposed algorithm is found to be superior over the common Newton‐Raphson algorithm, where we have also demonstrated that the latter can easily lead to grossly erroneous solutions. For the sake of illustration, a number of real‐world case study problems are solved by our algorithm and relevant comparisons are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207