MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2061771762 · doi:10.5539/jas.v5n9p102

Effects of Fertilizers and Mushroom Residues on Soil N2O Emission Under Rice-Wheat Rotation in Chengdu Plain

2013· article· en· W2061771762 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuesong Gao, Xiaolin Huang, Liangji Deng, Shirong Zhang, Zhou Jing, Min Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMushroomStrawNitrous oxideAgronomyFertilizerCrop residueEnvironmental scienceGreenhouse gasNitrogenResidue (chemistry)ChemistryAgricultureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas, and agricultural landscapes are major sources of atmospheric N2O. In this study, different types and levels of fertilization were applied to rice and wheat plants, including full crop straw, pure synthetic fertilizer and spent agro-residues from mushroom cultivation. N2O flux measurements were performed once a week using gas static chromatography-chamber between 2008 and 2009. In order to find out the effect of MR application on N2O emission, soil samples, environment-monitoring factors including soil moisture and temperature and biomass were also determined. Soil nitrate and ammonia were measured in soil extracts. The results showed that the total N2O emission decreased to 19,066 kg ha-1 in the rice stage and 45,312 kg ha-1 in the wheat stage under the mushroom residue (MR) application. This observation indicated that MR application (22,656.40 kg for rice and 9,533.33 kg for wheat) induced a decrease of N2O emission by 62.52% and 67.55% as compared with fertilizer and straw application, which are 6328.77±740.81b g ha-1, 7310.60±279.73b g ha-1 respectively. Therefore, MR application could be one of the most effective ways to reduce soil N2O emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural Science→Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→