MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061791080 · doi:10.1109/icip.2006.312703

Temporally-Adaptive MAP Estimation for Video Denoising in the Wavelet Domain

2006· article· en· W2061791080 on OpenAlexaff
Nikhil Gupta, Eugene Plotkin, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletArtificial intelligenceMaximum a posteriori estimationWavelet transformComputer scienceCascade algorithmWavelet packet decompositionStationary wavelet transformPattern recognition (psychology)Noise reductionComputer visionFrame (networking)Second-generation wavelet transformNoise (video)EstimatorVideo denoisingAlgorithmMathematicsVideo trackingVideo processingStatisticsMaximum likelihoodImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel, temporally-adaptive maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation algorithm for the reduction of additive video noise in the wavelet domain. We have exploited the fact that the spatial and temporal redundancies, which exist in a video sequence in the time domain, also persist in the wavelet domain. This allows the video motion to be captured in the wavelet domain. A new statistical model for video sequences is proposed, where the subband coefficients in individual frames as well as the wavelet co-efficient difference occurring between two consecutive frames are modeled using the generalized Laplacian distribution. Based on this model, a MAP estimator is developed that estimates the noise-free wavelet coefficients in the current frame, conditioned on the noisy coefficients in the current frame and the filtered coefficients in the past frame. The proposed algorithm has been tested using several different test sequences and corrupting noise powers and the experimental results show that the proposed scheme outperforms several state-of-the-art spatio-temporal filters in time and wavelet domains in terms of quantitative performance as well as visual quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207