MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061818451 · doi:10.1117/12.769331

RF-MEMS switches with new beam geometries: improvement of yield and lowering of actuation voltage

2007· article· en· W2061818451 on OpenAlexaff
King Yuk Chan, Mojgan Daneshmand, Raafat R. Mansour, Rodica Ramer

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaferMaterials scienceMicroelectromechanical systemsFabricationCantileverVoltageOptoelectronicsInsertion lossBeam (structure)Surface micromachiningRadio frequencyElectrical engineeringOpticsPhysicsEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One main obstacle that reduces the yield in RF MEMS technology is the variation of the residual stress resulting from fabrication. Residual stress can occur across the wafer, from the wafer to another wafer, or from one batch of fabrication to another one, and is more pronounced in cantilever bean type switches. For the present paper we have used new sets of dimples to reduce the sensitivity of the structure to the stress level. The SEM pictures of the proposed configuration and those of the conventional beam switch fabricated on the same wafer are analyzed sufficiently. The comparison amply proves soundness of our method. The high actuation voltage is another main issue that requires considerable investigation, and is generally higher in clamped-clamped beam type switches. In order to reduce the actuation voltage, we have designed, fabricated and tested several configurations with different supporting beams. The actuation voltage of as low as 10 volts is achieved and all switches exhibit excellent RF performance. At 40GHz the insertion loss of the switches varies ranging from 0.35dB to 0.7dB. It is evident that at a lower frequency ranges this becomes even better. At 40GHz, the return loss for all switches measured -24dB. Lastly, isolation is better than 20dB to 30dB for all the frequency band of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207