Characterizing random CSMA wireless networks: A stochastic geometry approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We charachterize the random CSMA wireless networks by statistically quantifing the intensity of simultaneously active nodes and the aggregate interference experienced by a generic node in the network. First, starting from a Poisson point process to model the spatial distribution of the network nodes, we propose a modified hard core point process (MHCPP) to model the spatial distribution of the simultaneously active users in a random CSMA network. Our motivation to propose the MHCPP is to mitigate the node intensity underestimation problem of the traditional hard core point process (HCPP). Then, we use the shot noise theory to statistically quantify the interference experienced by a generic node in the network. Closed-form expressions for the intensity of the simultaneously active nodes and the Laplace transform of the probability density function (and hence the moment generating function and the characteristic function), mean, and variance of the approximate aggregate interference are obtained. The accuracy of our model is validated by simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it