Hypothermia and recovery from respiratory arrest in a neonatal rat in vitro brain stem preparation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was designed to examine the possibility that respiratory arrest during hypothermia occurs at the level of premotor or motor neurons rather than at the level of the central rhythm generator itself. Specifically, we sought to determine the consequences of hypothermic cooling until respiratory arrest, and subsequent rewarming, on neurons in the pre-Bötzinger Complex, as an indication of the output of the entire rhythmogenic network; and from cervical spinal (phrenic) ventral roots, as an indication of motor neuron output, in an in vitro neonatal rat brain stem-spinal cord preparation. We found that hypothermia led to a slowing of the respiratory rhythm with little or no decrease in the magnitude of phrenic motor output or the field potential of pre-Bötzinger Complex neurons. Ultimate arrest occurred abruptly and simultaneously in recordings from both sites, indicating that the arrest was due to failure of the central rhythm-generating network, primarily due to removal of a conditional excitation. On being rewarmed, the motor output recorded at both sites was usually fractionated, initially suggesting that changes occurred in network synchronization either during cooling or during reactivation following hypothermic arrest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".