MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061837420 · doi:10.3137/ao.430203

Nutrients in the gully, Scotian shelf, Canada

2005· article· en· W2061837420 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Peter M. Strain, P. A. Yeats

Bibliographic record

VenueATMOSPHERE-OCEAN · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsNutrientEnvironmental scienceNitrateOceanographyBloomTemperate climateHydrology (agriculture)GeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Gully is a large shelf‐edge submarine canyon located on the eastern Scotian Shelf which has long been recognized as an area rich in marine life. This paper analyses the available nutrient (nitrate, silicate and phosphate) data for The Gully, including the new information collected since The Gully was designated a potential Marine Protected Area in 1998, and reports on nutrient climatology, nutrient transports and transport mechanisms, and surface nutrient distributions with a focus on how nutrient behaviour may or may not be different in The Gully than observed elsewhere on the Scotian Shelf. Seasonal cycles for nutrients in The Gully show the general patterns expected for nutrients in temperate coastal waters. The concentrations of all three nutrients in the surface layer (z ≤ 50 m) are relatively high in late fall and winter. Nitrate and silicate levels fall rapidly during the spring bloom and remain low during the summer and fall. Nitrate is more severely depleted than silicate. Phosphate levels are also lower in summer than in winter, but not depleted in summer, which is consistent with a nitrogen limited ecosystem. Attenuated versions of these seasonal cycles for the three nutrients are evident in the intermediate layer (50 < z ≤ 100 m), with substantial quantities of nutrients remaining in the summer. Little evidence of a seasonal cycle is seen in deeper waters (z > 100 m). These nutrient concentrations and seasonal cycles are similar to those found elsewhere on the shelf. A more detailed examination of nutrient concentrations in The Gully shows that higher nitrate, silicate and phosphate levels occur at the head of The Gully compared to the mouth, and on the Sable Bank side of The Gully compared to the Banquereau side. These observations are consistent with a trapping of nutrients associated with the counter‐clockwise circulation within The Gully, which could fuel more primary productivity in The Gully than on the adjacent shelf. Nutrient levels determined from surface samples collected at high frequency while survey vessels were underway showed anomalously high surface concentrations of nitrate and silicate that were consistent with the areas where the interaction of gully currents with the bottom topography at the head of The Gully and breaking internal waves along the north‐east edge of The Gully would enhance vertical mixing. Calculations of transports of nutrients through The Gully show that ∼5% of the external inputs of nitrate to the eastern Scotian Shelf are supplied through The Gully in winter, and ∼25% flow through The Gully in summer. Calculations based on these physical processes and the observed nutrient levels show that such mechanisms have the potential to increase production substantially in The Gully compared to other areas of the shelf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATMOSPHERE-OCEANSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207