MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061899713 · doi:10.1109/est.2014.10

Multispectral Hand Biometrics

2014· article· en· W2061899713 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRGB color modelBiometricsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMultispectral imageComputer visionPalm printPalmPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on a feasibility study of contactless hand biometrics using an RGB-Depth (RGB-D) camera such as the Kinect v2 prototype. The RGB, depth, and near-infrared (near-IR) spectra provide access to information such as palm print, hand shape, finger joint location, and vein patterns. Extraction of the hand is first done using depth data. The frames with the best palm position are selected, and then correlated into the synchronized RGB and near-IR frames for further processing of the related information in each spectra. Using the hand location information the palm can be extracted in the RGB data for use in palm recognition. Recognition of the palm is performed using Principle Component Analysis and K-Nearest-Neighbors for the classification. This multi-spectral analysis is a pre-requisite for hand shape, palm, and vein recognition to be integrated into a mass access control system or a personal computer secure access system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207