MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061943820 · doi:10.1029/2005gl022700

Spreading of overflow water from the Greenland to the Labrador Sea

2005· article· en· W2061943820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Toste Tanhua, Klaus Bulsiewicz, Monika Rhein

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsOcean gyreOceanographyGeologyStructural basinGroenlandiaClimatologyGeomorphologyFisheryIce sheet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1996, about 320 kg of SF6 were introduced in the center of the Greenland Sea gyre. We use this signal together with the CFC distribution to follow the spreading of Greenland gyre water from the Denmark Strait through the Irminger Basin and the Labrador Sea to the Grand Banks. In the summer of 2003 Denmark Strait Overflow Water tagged with deliberately released SF6 could be traced throughout the Irminger Basin to the central Labrador Sea, confirming that water with potential density of 28.045 contributes to the Denmark Strait Overflow. The upper limit of the transfer time from the central Greenland Sea to the Labrador Sea was found to be 7 years. This study suggests that roughly 4 kg of excess SF6 has been transported over the Denmark Strait and confirm earlier reported transport through the Faroe Bank Channel. These results should be considered when using SF6 as a transient tracer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207