Molecular characterization of four<i>Haemophilus influenzae</i>serotype a strains isolated from patients in Quebec, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four epidemiologically unrelated Haemophilus influenzae serotype a (Hia) strains from patients in Quebec, Canada, were characterized and found to represent 3 distinct groups. One isolate, found to be biotype I and sequence type (ST)-62 by multilocus sequence typing, was shown to possess the copper- and zinc-containing superoxide dismutase gene, sodC, and was suspected to belong to clonal division II. The other 3 isolates were classified as clonal division I based on the absence of the sodC gene. Among the 3 sodC-negative Hia strains, 2 were biotype II and had related STs (ST-23 and ST-403) and highly similar DNA fingerprints, similar to a group of previously described Hia isolates causing invasive disease in Manitoba, Canada. The remaining sodC-negative strain belonged to biotype I and ST-4 and shared no common allele with ST-23, ST-403, or ST-62. This isolate also possessed the IS1016-bexA partial deletion, which is often associated with increased virulence. Despite the small number of isolates used in this study, our finding of 3 distinct groups shows the existence of a potential genetic diversity not previously described for Hia. Whether this genetic diversity is related to the severity and epidemiology of Hia disease requires further studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".