MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062090437 · doi:10.2113/0260185

PALYNOLOGY AND MICROPALEONTOLOGY OF THE CLAM BANK FORMATION (LOWER DEVONIAN) OF WESTERN NEWFOUNDLAND, CANADA

2002· article· en· W2062090437 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elliott T. Burden

Bibliographic record

VenuePalynology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicropaleontologyPalynologyCitationIconCONTESTHistoryGeological surveyLibrary scienceArchaeologyPaleontologyGeographyGeologyOceanographyPolitical scienceComputer scienceEcologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| January 01, 2002 PALYNOLOGY AND MICROPALEONTOLOGY OF THE CLAM BANK FORMATION (LOWER DEVONIAN) OF WESTERN NEWFOUNDLAND, CANADA ELLIOTT T. BURDEN; ELLIOTT T. BURDEN Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X5, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar LOUISE QUINN; LOUISE QUINN Department of Geology, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba R7A 6A9, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar GODFREY S. NOWLAN; GODFREY S. NOWLAN Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 33rd Street N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar LINDA A. BAILEY-NILL LINDA A. BAILEY-NILL Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X5, Canada *Present Address: 11191 Westheimer, #206, Houston, Texas, 77042, U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Palynology (2002) 26 (1): 185–215. https://doi.org/10.2113/0260185 Article history first online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation ELLIOTT T. BURDEN, LOUISE QUINN, GODFREY S. NOWLAN, LINDA A. BAILEY-NILL; PALYNOLOGY AND MICROPALEONTOLOGY OF THE CLAM BANK FORMATION (LOWER DEVONIAN) OF WESTERN NEWFOUNDLAND, CANADA. Palynology 2002;; 26 (1): 185–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/0260185 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentBy SocietyPalynology Search Advanced Search Abstract Sandstone and siltstone samples collected from the lowest part of the Clam Bank Formation in western Newfoundland contain a distinctive monospecific conodont assemblage of Ozarkodina remscheidensis eosteinhornensis and O. remscheidensis ssp., confidently dated as Late Ludlow through Lochkovian. Palynomorph assemblages of terrestrial spores, acritarchs, chitinozoans, scolecodonts and plant fragments are relatively abundant and diverse in the lower 250 m of this formation. Taxa include the cryptosporegenera Cymbohilates, Acontotetras, Hispanaediscus, Laevolancis, and Tetrahedraletes, spore genera Ambitisporites, Aneurospora, Apiculiretusispora, Emphanisporites, Retusotriletes, Synorisporites, Vermiverruspora, and a new species Stellatispora fahraeusi. Acritarchs include the taxon Triangulina sanpetrensis and chitinozoa include Angochitina chlupaci. Palynomorphs indicate a Lochkovian age, corresponding with the Apiculiretusispora sp. E zone from Europe. In well preserved samples from this section, the fossil terrestrial palynomorph assemblages from these shallow marine deposits correspond closely in species diversity and concentration with values reported for modern shelf deposits located adjacent to low Arctic moss and sedge tundra. By inference, earliest Devonian terrestrial vegetation must have been relatively well developed on this ancient coastline. You do not currently have access to this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalynologySame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207