Stamen development in the Ericaceae. I. Anther wall, microsporogenesis, inversion, and appendages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Development of the introrse, tetrasporangiate, and normally dorsifixed and poricidal stamens has been studied at the gross morphological and cellular level in ten species of Ericaceae. Microsporogenesis, followed in four species, is normal, with cytokinesis simultaneous, forming tetrahedral tetrads. The tricolp(or)ate pollen is shed as permanent tetrads with each segment two-celled except in Enkianthus in which pollen grains are three-celled monads. Anther-wall development is similar in all four species initially, but no regular pattern of wall development could be recognized thereafter. The tapetum, of parietal origin, is binucleate, glandular, and mainly uniseriate. Viscin threads occur with the tetrads in the three rhododendroid species. A well-developed endothecium appears only in Enkianthus.Soon after stamen initiation, anthers of nine species invert at the eventual filament-anther junction to become introrse; in Enkianthus inversion occurs close to anthesis. Microsporogenesis starts during early inversion; greater cell elongation on the abaxial side of the young anther completes inversion by the late sporogenous-tissue stage. In Erica and, to a lesser extent Calluna, inversion results from greater abaxial than adaxial increase in cell number and length just above the filament-anther junction. The single vascular strand reflects the degree of inversion. Stamens of six species are appendaged; three have only awns, two only spurs, while one has both. Appendages arise from residual meristems after inversion is completed (or almost so) in all except Enkianthus. Awns develop at what will be the apex at maturity of each anther half. Their length and orientation vary among species. Only in Vaccinium do the awns become hollow (tubules). Spurs, varying in length, shape, and size, arise on the abaxial side from the filament, connective, or thecae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".