A Fuzzy Model with Thermodynamic Based Consequents and a Niching Swarm-Based Supervisor to Capture the Uncertainties of Damavand Power System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this investigation, a novel fuzzy mathematical program based on thermodynamic principles is implemented to capture the uncertainties of a practical power system, known as Damavand power plant. The proposed intelligent machine takes the advantages of a niching bio-inspired learning mechanism to be reconciled to the requirements of the problem at hand. The aim of the bio-inspired fuzzy based intelligent system is to yield a model capable of recognizing different operating parameters of Damavand power system under different operating conditions. To justify the privileges of using a niching metaheuristic over gradient descend methods, the authors use the data, derived through data acquisition, together with a machine learning based approach to estimate the multi-modality associated with the training of the proposed fuzzy model. Moreover, the niching bio-inspired metaheuristic, niching particle swarm optimization (NPSO), is compared to canonical PSO (CPSO), stochastic social PSO (SSPSO), unified PSO (UPSO), comprehensive learning PSO (CLPSO), PSO with constriction factor (PSOCF) and fully informed PSO (FIPSO). Through experiments and analysis of the characteristics of the problem being optimized, it is proved that NPSO is not only able to tackle the deficiencies of the learning process, but also can effectively adjust the fuzzy approach to conduct the identification process with a high degree of robustness and accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".