MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062179799 · doi:10.1042/cs20040085

Evidence against redox regulation of energy homoeostasis in humans at high altitude

2004· article· en· W2062179799 on OpenAlexaff
Damian M. Bailey, Philip N. Ainslie, Simon K. Jackson, Russell S. Richardson, Mohammed A. Ghatei

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyAntioxidantPlaceboEffects of high altitude on humansChemistryLeptinMedicineBiochemistryObesityPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study examined if free radicals and associated inflammatory sequelae influenced metabolic biomarkers involved in the neuro-endocrinological regulation of energy homoeostasis at high altitude. Sixteen mountaineers (11 males/five females) were matched for physical fitness and caloric intake and assigned in a double-blind manner to either antioxidant (n=8) or placebo (n=8) supplementation, which was enforced for 7 days at sea level and during an 11-day ascent to 4780 m. Enteral prophylaxis incorporated a daily bolus dose of 1 g of L-ascorbate, 400 international units of D,L-alpha-tocopherol acetate and 600 mg of alpha-lipoic acid. EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance) spectroscopic detection of PBN (alpha-phenyl-tert-butylnitrone) adducts confirmed an increase in the venous concentration of carbon-centred radicals at high altitude in the placebo group, whereas a decrease was observed in the antioxidant group (P<0.05 compared with that at sea level). EPR detection of DMSO/A*- (DMSO-supplemented ascorbate free radical) demonstrated that the increase in carbon-centred radicals at high altitude was associated with a decrease in ascorbate (r2=0.63; P<0.05). Ascent to high altitude (pooled placebo+antioxidant groups) also increased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (P<0.05 compared with that at sea level) and biomarkers of skeletal tissue damage (P<0.05). Despite a general decrease in leptin, insulin and glucose at high altitude (pooled placebo+antioxidant groups; P<0.05 compared with that at sea level), persistent anorexia resulted in a selective loss of body fat (P<0.05). In conclusion, antioxidant prophylaxis decreased the concentration of carbon-centred radicals at high altitude (P<0.05 compared with the placebo group), but did not influence markers of inflammation, appetite-related peptides, ad libitum nutrient intake or body composition. Thus free radicals do not appear to be involved in the inflammatory response and subsequent control of eating behaviour at high altitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ScienceSame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207