MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062217918 · doi:10.1037/h0087176

The relationship between level of self-esteem and suicidal ideation with stability of self-esteem as moderator.

2002· article· en· W2062217918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-esteemModerationPsychologySuicidal ideationSuicide ideationClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologySuicide preventionPoison controlMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cent trente et un etudiants du premier cycle universitaire ont participe a une etude de la relation entre l'ideation du suicide et le niveau et la stabilite ou l'instabilite de l'estime de soi, tout en controlant l'effet possible de la depression. Les resultats des analyses de correlations et une analyse de covariance montrent que l'ideation du suicide est liee de facon significative au niveau d'estime de soi, mais non pas a la stabilite ou a l'instabilite de l'estime de soi. Un effet d'interaction a montre que pour les individus ayant un estime de soi eleve, la variation dans la stabilite de l'estime de soi n'avait pas d'influence moderatrice significative, tandis que pour ceux ayant un estime de soi faible, un estime de soi stable apparaissait comme un facteur de protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.287
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.025 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it