The 5-Hydroxytryptamine(1A) Receptor Is Stably Palmitoylated, and Acylation Is Critical for Communication of Receptor with Gi Protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, we verified that the mouse 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) (5-HT(1A)) receptor is modified by palmitic acid, which is covalently attached to the protein through a thioester-type bond. Palmitoylation efficiency was not modulated by receptor stimulation with agonists. Block of protein synthesis by cycloheximide resulted in a significant reduction of receptor acylation, suggesting that palmitoylation occurs early after synthesis of the 5-HT(1A) receptor. Furthermore, pulse-chase experiments demonstrated that fatty acids are stably attached to the receptor. Two conserved cysteine residues 417 and 420 located in the proximal C-terminal domain were identified as acylation sites by site-directed mutagenesis. To address the functional role of 5-HT(1A) receptor acylation, we have analyzed the ability of acylation-deficient mutants to interact with heterotrimeric G(i) protein and to modulate downstream effectors. Replacement of individual cysteine residues (417 or 420) resulted in a significantly reduced coupling of receptor with G(i) protein and impaired inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. When both palmitoylated cysteines were replaced, the communication of receptors with G alpha(i) subunits was completely abolished. Moreover, non-palmitoylated mutants were no longer able to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation, indicating that palmitoylation of the 5-HT(1A) receptor is critical for the enabling of G(i) protein coupling/effector signaling. The receptor-dependent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase was also affected by acylation-deficient mutants, suggesting the importance of receptor palmitoylation for the signaling through the G beta gamma-mediated pathway, in addition to the G alpha(i)-mediated signaling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".