MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062248266 · doi:10.1115/detc2007-34351

Estimating Haul Truck Dutymeters Using Operational Data

2007· article· en· W2062248266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckHoist (device)Reliability engineeringReliability (semiconductor)Component (thermodynamics)Computer scienceWork (physics)Operational costsEngineeringAutomotive engineeringOperations researchMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern mobile mining equipment is becoming increasingly more instrumented in an effort to reduce operating costs through production and operation monitoring. This provides access to large amounts of data, primarily related to machine operation, not previously available. This work examines applicable operational loading parameters, and their relationship to haul truck component reliability. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine which parameters were strongly related to hoist cylinder and final drive reliability. These “dutymeters” can then be used to optimize particular aspects of the maintenance program, specifically to indicate the feasibility of component utilization beyond current replacement benchmarks. Components that have been lightly loaded throughout their operational life, as indicated by the defined dutymeters, could qualify for extended use with a greater chance of reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it