MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062252593 · doi:10.1109/icip.2014.7025872

Image saliency detection via multi-scale statistical non-redundancy modeling

2014· article· en· W2062252593 on OpenAlex
Christian Scharfenberger, Aanchal Jain, Alexander Wong, Paul Fieguth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)Artificial intelligenceComputer sciencePixelPattern recognition (psychology)WaveletStatistical modelParametric statisticsImage (mathematics)Computer visionWavelet transformMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multi-scale statistical non-redundancy modeling approach is introduced for saliency detection in images. The statistical non-redundancy of pixels at different wavelet sub-bands is characterized using a multi-dimensional lattice of non-parametric statistical models, thus taking into account image saliency at multiple scales. This identifies saliency in image attributes at multiple scales, and makes saliency detection strongly robust against noisy input images. Results based on images from a public database show that the proposed approach outperforms existing single and multi-scale approaches, particularly when dealing with noisy images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionFrench-language works237,207