MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062254236 · doi:10.1159/000071613

The X chromosome deletion in <i>Hyp</i> mice extends into the intergenic region but does not include the <i>Sat</i> gene downstream from <i>Phex</i>

2002· article· en· W2062254236 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Sabbagh, Claude Gauthier, Harriet S. Tenenhouse

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetic and Genome Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPHEXBiologyGeneGeneticsMolecular biologyHypophosphatemic RicketsIntronHypophosphatemiaChromosomeMutationRicketsVitamin D and neurologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The murine Hyp mutation is a model for X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH), the most prevalent form of inherited rickets in humans. Although mutations in the murine Phex gene and the human PHEX gene have been identified in both murine and human disorders, the extent of the Hyp deletion on the mouse X chromosome has not been delineated. In the present study we demonstrate that the Hyp deletion starts in the middle of Phex intron 15 and includes approximately 48 kb of the 3' region of the Phex gene and approximately 10 kb of intergenic sequence on the mouse X chromosome. In addition, we show that the Hyp deletion does not involve the downstream spermidine/spermine N1-acetyl transferase (Sat; formerly Ssat) gene and thus is not a contiguous gene deletion syndrome. Our data indicate that the Hyp mouse is a true homolog of XLH in humans and underscore the validity of this murine model in studies of XLH pathophysiology and for testing novel treatment modalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetic and Genome ResearchSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207