Hearing preservation and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was the assessment of hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery. This study reports a prospective cohort of 40 patients with clinically useful hearing from a consecutive series of 191 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. The patients were managed in a tertiary centre by a combined team of Neurosurgeon, Otologist and Neuro-monitoring Scientist via a neuro-oto-surgical-retrosigmoid approach. Pure tone speech audiometry was conducted preoperatively and 6 months to 9 years following surgery. Using the AA0-HNS classification, useful hearing, i.e. grades A, B and C, was preserved in 47.5% of patients. Thirty-eight per cent achieved grade A or B. Using appropriate surgical and monitoring techniques, it is possible to preserve useful hearing in approximately 50% of patients following removal of a vestibular schwannoma via the retro-sigmoid approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it