MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062263926 · doi:10.1115/icmm2004-2407

Multistage Viscous Micropumps

2004· article· en· W2062263926 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Abdelgawad, Ibrahim Hassan, Nabil Esmail, Patricia Phutthavong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicropumpMechanicsDragMicrochannelRotor (electric)Viscous liquidMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The viscous micropump consists of a cylinder placed eccentrically inside a microchannel, where the rotor axis is perpendicular to the channel axis. When the cylinder rotates, a net force is transferred to the fluid due to the unequal shear stresses on the upper and lower surfaces of the rotor. Consequently, this causes the surrounding fluid in the channel to displace towards the microchannel outlet. The simplicity of the viscous micropump renders it ideal for micro pumping, however, previous studies have shown that its performance is still less than what is required for various applications. The performance of the viscous micropump, in terms of flow rate, pressure head and efficiency, may be enhanced by implementing more than one rotor into the configuration. The present study will numerically investigate the performance of various configurations of the viscous micropumps with multiple rotors, namely the dual-horizontal rotor, the triple-horizontal rotor, the symmetrical-dual-vertical rotor, and the 8-shaped dual-vertical rotor. The development of drag force with time, as well as the viscous resisting torque on the cylinders were studied. In addition, the corresponding drag and moment coefficients were calculated. Results show that the symmetrical-dual-vertical rotor configuration yields the best efficiency, and generates the highest flow rate. The steady state performance of the single-stage micropump was compared with the available experimental and numerical data, and was found to be in very good agreement. This work provides a foundation for future research on the subject of fluid phenomena in viscous micropumps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207