Biofiltration d'air pollué par du xylène sur un nouveau lit à base de cellulose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem related to air discharge contaminated with volatile organic solvents (VOS) is the scope of numerous researches. Throughout the last decades, the development of different types of bioreactors to treat atmospheric emissions contaminated with VOS has been observed, such as: the bioscrubber, the percolating filter and the biofilter. These bioreactors are processes that use microorganisms in order to degrade the VOS into carbon dioxide, water, and biomass. This paper presents the results of a study on degradation by biofiltration of xylene contained in air, with a new filtering bed composed of cellulose. We have studied the conversion, the capacity of elimination of xylene with respect to the inlet load and the production of carbon dioxide. An elimination capacity of 75 g·m -3 ·h -1 for an inlet con centration to the biofilter of 1.7 g·m -3 of xylene has been obtained, which is a value that is superior to values mentioned in the literature. Measurements of temperature, pressure drop, and moisture content have been taken regularly so as to evaluate the influence of these parameters in the degradation process of xylene by microorganisms. Counts of bacteria and yeast/mould present in the filtering bed have been performed in order to follow the evolution of these micro organisms. At last, modeling based on the Ottengraf's model (1986) has been developed with the experimental data.Key words: treatment, air, biofiltration, xylenes, cellulose, volatile organic solvents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".