MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062310731 · doi:10.1364/fts.2001.fmd1

Diffraction and the lineshape of Fourier transform spectrometers

2001· article· en· W2062310731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFourier Transform Spectroscopy · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffractionMonochromatic colorOpticsFourier transformPhysicsMonochromatic electromagnetic plane waveField (mathematics)Aperture (computer memory)WavenumberPlane waveDiffraction efficiencyFresnel diffractionComputational physicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The instrument lineshape (ILS) of an on-axis monochromatic plane wave diffracted by the aperture stop is first calculated. This corresponds to the diffracted lineshape of a point source in the center of the field of view (FOV). This diffracted lineshape is then compared to the contribution, without diffraction, of a finite field of view on the ILS. With this comparison, a condition is derived for the diffraction to be a negligible effet on the ILS. The condition depends only upon the throughput and upon the minimal wavenumber observed. When the condition is not respected, numerical calculations must be carried to include the contribution of the diffraction on the ILS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it