MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062321017 · doi:10.3917/riges.363.0043

Embaucher et former le personnel au sein de grappes ou de pôles d'entreprises

2011· article· fr· W2062321017 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Denis Chabault, Annabelle Hulin

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGynecologyPhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les grappes industrielles ou les pôles de compétitivité, qui sont des regroupements régionaux d’entreprises et/ou de centres de recherche sur une thématique industrielle donnée, sont considérés comme un fleuron de l’activité économique moderne. Toutefois, si leurs incidences positives sont maintenant reconnues, on ne sait pas encore très bien comment il faut gérer ces regroupements, et plus particulièrement en matière de gestion des ressources humaines (GRH), afin d’en optimiser les retombées. Cet article vise à analyser les particularités des pratiques d’embauche et de formation des ressources humaines dans les grappes industrielles et les pôles de compétitivité en France. Par la suite, nous donnons aux dirigeants, aux cadres et aux professionnels des conseils pour faire de la GRH un véritable levier d’amélioration de la performance et de la productivité des grappes industrielles et des pôles de compétitivité en France comme partout ailleurs. Fonctions : GRH, management, GOP, économie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207