MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062328391 · doi:10.3917/eger.259.0673

Pulverschrift Berlin im löchrigen Europa

2010· article· fr· W2062328391 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Paula Mayr

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes Germaniques · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article reprend la notion de conceptualisation de l’espace selon Gilles Deleuze et Félix Guattari dans Mille Plateaux pour mettre en lumière la ou les conceptions de l’Europe chez Y?ko Tawada. L’exemple de la pièce Pulverschrift Berlin révèle que Tawada se sert de lieux concrets comme de points de départ pour saper les conceptions de l’Europe fondée sur des notions stables telles que territoire, culture et histoire, mais sans dénier pour autant à l’Europe son caractère de réalité. L’ouvrage de Tawada crée ainsi ce que Deleuze et Guattari qualifie d’espace « troué », ce qui donne lieu à des oscillations spatio-temporelles entre le local et le global, le passé et le présent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes GermaniquesSame topicGerman Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207