MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062347151 · doi:10.7202/031589ar

La vie professionnelle et la santé des infirmières depuis la transformation du réseau de la santé

2006· article· fr· W2062347151 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Renée Bourbonnais, Monique Comeau, Chantal Viens, Chantal Brisson, Denis Laliberté, Romaine Malenfant, Michel Vézina

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté mentale au Québec · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de QuébecUniversité Laval
FundersMinistère de la SantéMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociaux
KeywordsPsychological distressNursingPsychologyHumanitiesMedicineMental healthArtPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis quelques années, le réseau de la santé québécois traverse une période de transformation importante qui vise la réduction des coûts et une meilleure efficience. La présente étude avait comme objectif de décrire les effets de la transformation du réseau sur la vie professionnelle et la santé des infirmières de l'agglomération de Québec. Malgré Ie devis transversal de l'étude qui ne permet pas de faire des liens de cause à effet et malgré le fait qu'elle ne s'adressait qu'aux infirmières qui étaient toujours à l'emploi des établissements, la recherche montre une augmentation de la prévalence d'un niveau élevé de détresse psychologique chez les infirmières depuis le début de la transformation. Des interventions dans les milieux de travail devraient s'appuyer sur les facteurs professionnels identifiés par de nombreuses infirmières de l'étude comme étant problématiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté mentale au QuébecSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207