Toward a computational tool predicting the stereochemical outcome of asymmetric reactions: Development of the molecular mechanics‐based program ACE and application to asymmetric epoxidation reactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development and application of ACE, a program that predicts the stereochemical outcome of asymmetric reactions is presented. As major implementations, ACE includes a genetic algorithm to carry out an efficient global conformational search combined with a conjugate gradient minimization routine for local optimization and a corner flap algorithm to search ring conformations. Further improvements have been made that enable ACE to generate Boltzmann populations of conformations, to investigate highly asynchronous reactions, to compute fluctuating partial atomic charges and solvation energy and to automatically construct reactants and products from libraries of catalysts and substrates. Validation on previously investigated reactions (asymmetric Diels Alder cycloadditions and organocatalyzed aldol reactions) followed by application to a number of alkene epoxidation reactions and a comparative study of DFT-derived and ACE-derived predictions demonstrate the accuracy and usefulness of ACE in the context of asymmetric catalyst design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it