MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062383245 · doi:10.1139/p05-060

Pion production and multifractality in ultrarelativistic nuclear collision evidence of constant specific heat

2005· article· en· W2062383245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dipak Ghosh, Argha Deb, Madhumita Lahiri, R. Das

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMultifractal systemPionFractalCollisionSpecific heatFractal dimensionNuclear physicsConstant (computer programming)Production (economics)Particle physicsThermodynamicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multifractal analysis of the pions produced in 32 S–AgBr and 16 O–AgBr interactions at 200 and 60 AGeV, respectively, is performed following the method proposed by Takagi. The generalized fractal dimensions D q 's are determined and found to decrease with order, thereby supporting multifractality in multiparticle production. From the knowledge of D q , the multifractal specific heat is calculated for each interaction. It has been observed that the value of the specific heat is independent of the collision energy. PACS Nos.: 25.75–q, 24.60.Ky, 12.40.Ee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207