MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062393775 · doi:10.1111/head.12188

Central Nervous System Venulitis Presenting as Migraine

2013· article· en· W2062393775 on OpenAlexaff
Serena L. Orr, Marlise P. dos Santos, Roman Juřenčák, Jean Michaud, Elka Miller, Asif Doja

Bibliographic record

VenueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCentral nervous systemMigraineBrain biopsyMagnetic resonance imagingBiopsyWhite matterPathologyPediatricsRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) venulitis. BACKGROUND: Primary angiitis of the CNS is a rare but increasingly well-recognized cause of morbidity in children. It primarily involves the arteries and arterioles of the CNS, with only 1 published case of a pediatric patient found to have isolated CNS venulitis on brain biopsy. CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old female with a 4-year history of migraines presented with increasingly frequent migraines and right-sided hemiplegia. Infectious, hematologic, and rheumatologic work-ups were negative. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple rim-enhancing lesions consistent with calcifications affecting the deep left white matter. On brain biopsy, there was evidence of an inflammatory process involving small veins and venules. The patient displayed clinical improvement with a course of high-dose steroids and 6 monthly cyclophosphamide infusions followed by maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil. DISCUSSION: We describe a case of pediatric CNS venulitis presenting with migraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face PainSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207