MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062458198 · doi:10.1002/chem.200700710

Overcoming the Demons of Protecting Groups with Amphoteric Molecules

2007· article· en· W2062458198 on OpenAlexaff
Andrei K. Yudin, Ryan Hili

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemoselectivityFunctional groupProtecting groupMoleculeCombinatorial chemistryGroup (periodic table)ChemistryNanotechnologyBiochemical engineeringOrganic chemistryEngineeringMaterials scienceCatalysisPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthetic organic chemists have long depended on protecting group manipulations when faced with the challenges of chemoselectivity and functional group incompatibility. Overcoming this dependence will improve the overall efficiency of chemical synthesis. By taking advantage of orthogonally reactive functional groups, amphoteric molecules can afford access not only to more efficient and strategic syntheses but also to the development of novel chemical transformations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicAsymmetric Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207