Multielemental Laser-Enhanced Ionization Spectrometry for the Determination of Lead at the Trace Level in Pelletized Coal Using Laser Ablation and Internal Standard Signal Normalization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laser ablation laser-enhanced ionization (LA-LEI) was used for the simultaneous measurement of lead and indium in pelletized graphite and coal samples. UV Laser ablation of the solid samples was performed in an ablation cell and the ablated material was carried by a flow of gas to a miniature LEI flame where lead was detected. The influence of parameters such as binder content of the solid pellets and dispersion of the analytes spiked in the sample material, as well as the number of ablation pulses per crater on signal repeatability and on the size and shape of ejected particles was examined. Measurement repeatability values of 2 to 5% of relative standard deviation were obtained using indium as an internal standard to correct for variations in the ablation rate. A limit of detection of 120 nanograms per gram was calculated for the determination of Pb in high-purity graphite. The Pb concentration in the NIST 1632c Bituminous Coal certified reference material was determined to within 1% of its certified value, using graphite as the matrix-matching material and In as the internal standard in pelletized solid samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it