MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062486377 · doi:10.1177/0887302x0101900404

Trousers Developed from the ASTM D5586 and the Canada Standard Sizing for Women's Apparel

2001· article· en· W2062486377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueClothing and Textiles Research Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicColor perception and design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingProduct (mathematics)PsychologyTest (biology)SizingSample (material)Social psychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theory of product performance and consumer satisfaction was applied to examine the instrumental and expressive outcomes associated with prototype trousers developed from the Canada Standard Sizing (CSS) size code M18 and the ASTM D5586 size code MPl6. Instrumental outcomes are positive or negative judgments of a product based on consumers' reactions to the physical aspects of a product. Expressive outcomes refer to positive or negative judgments of a product based on consumers' personal or emotional reactions to a product. A convenience sample of 20 women aged 56 to 89 years participated in a two-week wear test followed by face-to-face interviews. The results showed that (a) the participants' measurements were similar to the ASTM MP16 measurements; (b) although participants were satisfied with the ASTM prototype trouser, there was no significant difference in overall satisfaction; (c) participants tended to associate both prototype trousers with instrumental outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it