MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062486876 · doi:10.1017/s096354831400056x

An Alternative Proof of the Linearity of the Size-Ramsey Number of Paths

2014· article· en· W2062486876 on OpenAlexaff
Andrzej Dudek, Paweł Prałat

Bibliographic record

VenueCombinatorics Probability Computing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicLimits and Structures in Graph Theory
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsRamsey's theoremMathematicsMonochromatic colorGraphLinearityInteger (computer science)Discrete mathematicsUpper and lower boundsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The size-Ramsey number $\^{r} $ (F) of a graph F is the smallest integer m such that there exists a graph G on m edges with the property that every colouring of the edges of G with two colours yields a monochromatic copy of F. In 1983, Beck provided a beautiful argument that shows that $\^{r} $ (Pn) is linear, solving a problem of Erdős. In this note, we provide another proof of this fact that actually gives a better bound, namely, $\^{r} $ (Pn) < 137n for n sufficiently large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.012
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCombinatorics Probability ComputingSame topicLimits and Structures in Graph TheoryFrench-language works237,207