MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062493647 · doi:10.1063/1.3131466

MRI-Controlled Rapidly Scanned Focused Ultrasound Hyperthermia for Temperature Sensitive Localized Drug Delivery

2009· article· en· W2062493647 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Staruch, Jeff Wachsmuth, Rajiv Chopra, Kullervo Hynynen, Emad S. Ebbini

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransducerFocused ultrasoundMaterials scienceUltrasoundBiomedical engineeringHyperthermiaTemperature measurementTrajectoryAcousticsPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temperature sensitive drug delivery systems have been limited by a lack of versatile, noninvasive methods for applying uniform non‐ablative heating. The objective of this study was to characterize and demonstrate an MRI‐controlled scanned focused ultrasound system capable of maintaining temporally and spatially uniform target temperatures ex vivo. Degassed turkey breast was heated in a clinical 3 T MRI using a single‐element focused transducer rapidly scanned along a circular trajectory by an MRI‐compatible transducer positioning system. Spatial temperature distribution was measured every 5 s using the proton resonance frequency shift. Temperature at the center of the scan trajectory was used as input for proportional‐integral control of applied acoustic power. Uniform temperature elevation of 10° C was maintained for several minutes in a 5 mm target diameter using controller gain values identified by numerical simulations. Simultaneous scanning and imaging caused a correctable periodic drift in baseline phase. Temporally and spatially uniform MRI‐controlled scanned focused ultrasound hyperthermia was demonstrated ex vivo with a simple feedback control system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207