MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062504473 · doi:10.1260/026635105775213809

Folding Sleeves — Variations on a Theme of the Earthworm

2005· article· en· W2062504473 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Space Structures · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarthwormPeristalsisEnvelope (radar)Folding (DSP implementation)Tube (container)BiomimeticsComputer scienceMaterials scienceAnatomyMechanical engineeringBiologyEngineeringNanotechnologyEcologyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The earthworm is a pressurised fluid tube whose peristaltic locomotion is facilitated by distinct structural features. The envelope of the earthworm incorporates two primary morphological and structural systems: A skeletal system, formed by a helical network of collagen fibres, and a continuous system composed of a stretchable membrane. The two systems closely interact under internal fluid pressure to produce the peristaltic locomotion. The paper presents applications of foldable sleeves or tubes, simulating the morphological and kinematical aspects of the earthworm locomotion, focusing on the combination of skeletal and compatible stressed-skin systems to produce a functional envelope. Several skeletal and stressed-skin structural systems and their combinations are presented, making extensive use of physical models. These systems are characterised by helical morphological features, which preserve the main kinematical characteristics of earthworm locomotion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it