MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062507405 · doi:10.1107/s0108767305088896

Ultra-high resolution measurement at BL41XU of SPring-8

2005· article· en· W2062507405 on OpenAlexaff
N. Shimizu, Masahide Kawamoto, Kazuya Hasegawa, Hajime Sakai, Atsushi Nisawa, Tetsuya Shimizu, Toru Nakatsu, Hiroyuki Katoh, Masanobu Yamamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBiological and Environmental ResearchNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsSpring (device)Environmental scienceRemote sensingMaterials scienceGeologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural models are auto-build and structures are refined, verified and analyzed using semi-automated computational tools.Functional analysis is being performed using a newly developed ProFunc server.3D models of relevant members of the sequence family are generated and their quality is assessed.Majority of the steps in the MCSG pipeline are tracked in near real time by the database.All the structures and their analysis are made available to the public using the MCSG database and web tools.The MCSG structure determination pipeline when combined with data collection facilities at third generation synchrotrons, advanced software and computing resources resulted in significant acceleration of structure determination of novel proteins.Using this pipeline the MCSG has determined 112 novel structures in 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersFrench-language works237,207