Electrokinetic flow in a free surface-guided microchannel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate electro-osmotic flow in a free surface-guided microchannel. Although multiphase microfluidics has attracted interests over the past few years, electro-osmotic flow involving free surfaces has yet to be studied in great detail. Several proposed theoretical models describing this type of electro-osmotic flow need to be verified by experiments. In this work, a surface-guided microchannel was fabricated using an innovative fabrication process. Because the liquid stream was confined by surface properties, solid sidewalls did not exist in this microchannel. Instead, the sidewalls were water-air or water-oil interfaces. Using this microchannel, two systems were investigated: water-air system and water-oil system. The experimental results were compared against three proposed models in order to gain more understandings on this type of electro-osmotic flow. Experimental results show that the liquid velocity near the liquid-fluid interface resembles a pluglike profile for both water-air and water-oil systems. Computer simulation results show that with the consideration of the electrical double layer and the surface charges, the electric forces inside the electrical double layer are counteracted by the surface forces at the liquid-fluid interface, also resulting in a pluglike velocity profile in the microchannel. Therefore, the model that considers both the electrical double layer and the surface charges at the liquid-fluid interface best describe the physical phenomenon observed in experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".