MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O retorno da "criança-questão": uma leitura do filme Ma vie en rose a partir de Melanie Klein

2002· article· pt· W2062595660 on OpenAlexaff
Deborah P. Britzman

Bibliographic record

VenueEstilos da Clinica · 2002
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo analisa a complicada relação entre educação e psicanálise com base no primeiro estudo de caso de Melanie Klein, sobre "Fritz", o estudo de Freud do "Pequeno Hans" e um filme contemporâneo. Todos eles representam dilemas da relação criança-adulto, e o fazem através de surpreendentes questionamentos por parte das crianças sobre a sexualidade e a natureza da existência. Esses textos do arquivo introduzem também a questão de 'o que mais a educação pode significar quando se levam em conta a associação livre e o inconsciente?' Finalmente, o artigo reflete sobre o difícil conhecimento colocado pelo problema de se conhecer a história de alguém por meio da questão do Outro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.013
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstilos da ClinicaSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207