In vitro Cellular Immunity and in vivo Delayed Hypersensitivity in Uremic Patients Maintained on Hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uremic patients on hemodialysis for periods in excess of 1 year have a significantly better survival rate for their renal allografts than do similar patients hemodialyzed for less than 1 year. Lymphocytes from the patients of both groups show no difference in response in the mixed leukocyte culture reaction and to nonspecific mitogens such as PHA and PWM. A significant difference between the two groups of patients was observed with regard to their cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity reactions and in their in vitro lymphocyte responses to streptokinase-streptodornase. Patients hemodialyzed over 1 year were anergic to skin test antigens and had a significantly diminished in vitro response to streptokinase-streptodornase. Monitoring of patients for delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions and for in vitro lymphocyte responses to streptokinase-streptodornase may be of some practical value in selecting recipients for renal transplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".